Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Background. In addition to social and environmental determinants, people’s values and preferences determine daily food choices. This study evaluated adults’ values and preferences regarding unprocessed red meat (URM) and processed meat (PM) and their willingness to change their consumption in the fa...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Claudia Valli, Marilina Santero, Anna Prokop-Dorner, Victoria Howatt, Bradley C. Johnston, Joanna Zajac, Mi-Ah Han, Ana Pereira, Fernando Kenji Nampo, Gordon H. Guyatt, Malgorzata M. Bala, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Montserrat Rabassa
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	health values and preferences red meat processed meat cross-sectional study mixed methods Medicine R
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/b99c00a20ebb4dfd91bf0ce0552649f2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:b99c00a20ebb4dfd91bf0ce0552649f2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:b99c00a20ebb4dfd91bf0ce0552649f22021-11-11T16:41:39ZHealth Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study10.3390/ijerph1821115851660-46011661-7827https://doaj.org/article/b99c00a20ebb4dfd91bf0ce0552649f22021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/21/11585https://doaj.org/toc/1661-7827https://doaj.org/toc/1660-4601Background. In addition to social and environmental determinants, people’s values and preferences determine daily food choices. This study evaluated adults’ values and preferences regarding unprocessed red meat (URM) and processed meat (PM) and their willingness to change their consumption in the face of possible undesirable health consequences. Methods. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study including a quantitative assessment through an online survey, a qualitative inquiry through semi-structured interviews, and a follow-up assessment through a telephone survey. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regressions, and thematic analysis. Results. Of 304 participants, over 75% were unwilling to stop their consumption of either URM or PM, and of those unwilling to stop, over 80% were also unwilling to reduce. Men were less likely to stop meat intake than women (odds ratios < 0.4). From the semi-structured interviews, we identified three main themes: the social and/or family context of meat consumption, health- and non-health-related concerns about meat, and uncertainty of the evidence. At three months, 63% of participants reported no changes in meat intake. Conclusions. When informed about the cancer incidence and mortality risks of meat consumption, most respondents would not reduce their intake. Public health and clinical nutrition guidelines should ensure that their recommendations are consistent with population values and preferences.Claudia ValliMarilina SanteroAnna Prokop-DornerVictoria HowattBradley C. JohnstonJoanna ZajacMi-Ah HanAna PereiraFernando Kenji NampoGordon H. GuyattMalgorzata M. BalaPablo Alonso-CoelloMontserrat RabassaMDPI AGarticlehealthvalues and preferencesred meatprocessed meatcross-sectional studymixed methodsMedicineRENInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol 18, Iss 11585, p 11585 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	health values and preferences red meat processed meat cross-sectional study mixed methods Medicine R
spellingShingle	health values and preferences red meat processed meat cross-sectional study mixed methods Medicine R Claudia Valli Marilina Santero Anna Prokop-Dorner Victoria Howatt Bradley C. Johnston Joanna Zajac Mi-Ah Han Ana Pereira Fernando Kenji Nampo Gordon H. Guyatt Malgorzata M. Bala Pablo Alonso-Coello Montserrat Rabassa Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study
description	Background. In addition to social and environmental determinants, people’s values and preferences determine daily food choices. This study evaluated adults’ values and preferences regarding unprocessed red meat (URM) and processed meat (PM) and their willingness to change their consumption in the face of possible undesirable health consequences. Methods. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study including a quantitative assessment through an online survey, a qualitative inquiry through semi-structured interviews, and a follow-up assessment through a telephone survey. We performed descriptive statistics, logistic regressions, and thematic analysis. Results. Of 304 participants, over 75% were unwilling to stop their consumption of either URM or PM, and of those unwilling to stop, over 80% were also unwilling to reduce. Men were less likely to stop meat intake than women (odds ratios < 0.4). From the semi-structured interviews, we identified three main themes: the social and/or family context of meat consumption, health- and non-health-related concerns about meat, and uncertainty of the evidence. At three months, 63% of participants reported no changes in meat intake. Conclusions. When informed about the cancer incidence and mortality risks of meat consumption, most respondents would not reduce their intake. Public health and clinical nutrition guidelines should ensure that their recommendations are consistent with population values and preferences.
format	article
author	Claudia Valli Marilina Santero Anna Prokop-Dorner Victoria Howatt Bradley C. Johnston Joanna Zajac Mi-Ah Han Ana Pereira Fernando Kenji Nampo Gordon H. Guyatt Malgorzata M. Bala Pablo Alonso-Coello Montserrat Rabassa
author_facet	Claudia Valli Marilina Santero Anna Prokop-Dorner Victoria Howatt Bradley C. Johnston Joanna Zajac Mi-Ah Han Ana Pereira Fernando Kenji Nampo Gordon H. Guyatt Malgorzata M. Bala Pablo Alonso-Coello Montserrat Rabassa
author_sort	Claudia Valli
title	Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study
title_short	Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study
title_full	Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study
title_fullStr	Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study
title_full_unstemmed	Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study
title_sort	health related values and preferences regarding meat intake: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/b99c00a20ebb4dfd91bf0ce0552649f2
work_keys_str_mv	AT claudiavalli healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT marilinasantero healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT annaprokopdorner healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT victoriahowatt healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT bradleycjohnston healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT joannazajac healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT miahhan healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT anapereira healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT fernandokenjinampo healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT gordonhguyatt healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT malgorzatambala healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT pabloalonsocoello healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy AT montserratrabassa healthrelatedvaluesandpreferencesregardingmeatintakeacrosssectionalmixedmethodsstudy
_version_	1718432261075894272

Health Related Values and Preferences Regarding Meat Intake: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

Ejemplares similares