Perception of geometric sequences and numerosity both predict formal geometric competence in primary school children

Abstract While most animals have a sense of number, only humans have developed symbolic systems to describe and organize mathematical knowledge. Some studies suggest that human arithmetical knowledge may be rooted in an ancient mechanism dedicated to perceiving numerosity, but it is not known if for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Castaldi, Roberto Arrighi, Guido M. Cicchini, Arianna Andolfi, Giuseppe Maduli, David C. Burr, Giovanni Anobile
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021
Subjects:
R
Q
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/f4a05376d77d4c87b99b706454a8e9e4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract While most animals have a sense of number, only humans have developed symbolic systems to describe and organize mathematical knowledge. Some studies suggest that human arithmetical knowledge may be rooted in an ancient mechanism dedicated to perceiving numerosity, but it is not known if formal geometry also relies on basic, non-symbolic mechanisms. Here we show that primary-school children who spontaneously detect and predict geometrical sequences (non-symbolic geometry) perform better in school-based geometry tests indexing formal geometric knowledge. Interestingly, numerosity discrimination thresholds also predicted and explained a specific portion of variance of formal geometrical scores. The relation between these two non-symbolic systems and formal geometry was not explained by age or verbal reasoning skills. Overall, the results are in line with the hypothesis that some human-specific, symbolic systems are rooted in non-symbolic mechanisms.